Media

|

News

Opposition demands AFP probe of leaked note over PM's melon gaffe

August 12, 2026

Wednesday 12 August 2026
James Massola
The Age


 The federal opposition is demanding a police investigation into the apparent  leaking of a diplomatic note sent by the Japanese government to its  counterparts in Canberra, after details of the note were published in media  outlets.
 
 The diplomatic note, dated July 13 and sent by the government in Tokyo,  addressed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's appearance on the Bush Deep  podcast with Nikki Osborne on July 3, during which the comedian made a joke  to the prime minister about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi smuggling  in crown melons under her shirt ''like Pamela Anderson'' to present as a gift  to Albanese.
 
 The prime minister gestured with both hands in front of his chest as he told  Osborne his Japanese counterpart had given him two melons as a gift. While  the comment mostly escaped scrutiny when the podcast was first published, a  piece in the Japanese Times in late July lamented the comment. This week,  former Japanese ambassador to Australia Shingo Yamagami wrote a critical  opinion piece in The Australian that labelled Albanese's gesture  ''insulting'' and ignorant.
 
 Several media outlets have since published extracts of the diplomatic note  sent to Canberra from Tokyo, which noted ''sensationalised reporting in the  Australian media'' about the podcast interview and which undertook that ''no  action'' would be taken over the incident.
 
 The note also stressed the melons were bought locally.
 
 The sharing of this letter prompted the opposition's defence spokesman James  Paterson and foreign affairs spokesman Ted O'Brien to write to Australian  Federal Police commissioner Krissy Barrett and ask for an investigation into  the leak.
 
 ''We write to refer the possibly unlawful disclosure of confidential and  sensitive correspondence from the Government of Japan to the Department of  Prime Minister and Cabinet,'' the pair wrote.
 
 ''We are concerned that a diplomatic note with a critical bilateral partner  has potentially been provided to the media without authorisation. Given that  communications between governments can be classified, it is possible that  this disclosure is a criminal offence under Division 122 of the Commonwealth  Criminal Code.
 
 ''It is critically important that Australia's bilateral partners believe that  their confidential correspondence will be handled appropriately by the  Australian government. It would be gravely damaging to our national interest  if they formed the view the Australian government does not take unauthorised  disclosure seriously by promptly investigating it.''

Recent News

All Posts