Billionaire's Rolf Harris comparison a teal blue

January 3, 2025

Friday 03 January 2025
Ellen Ransley & Katrina Curtis
The Nightly


 Simon Holmes a Court, multi-millionaire founder of the movement that claims  to encourage more decency in politics, revels in likening ex-PM to a child  sex offender
 
 Billionaire's Rolf Harris comparison a teal blue Holmes a Court refuses to  back down from 'disgusting' Morrison barb Multimillionaire teal backer Simon  Holmes a Court has been lashed and told to apologise after he compared Scott  Morrison's popularity to that of child abuse offender Rolf Harris.
 
 The social media post has prompted senior Liberals to demand an apology to  the former prime minister and that the so-called independents backed by Mr  Holmes a Court's Climate 200 body distance themselves from him.
 
 The emergence of the teals, which based their campaign on tackling climate  change and promoting integrity in politics, was one of the defining features  of the 2022 Federal election.
 
 Climate 200 is preparing to support an even larger swath of candidates at  this year's poll.
 
 Mr Holmes a Court made the comparison in response to Mr Morrison's photo of  himself, his wife Jenny, US president-elect Donald Trump and his wife Melania  captioned "HNY 2025 from Mar-a-Lago", above.
 
 The businessman and climate activist wrote that if Mr Morrison were to ever  read the replies to the tweet, "it'll be the second time he'll have  wished he could stay in the US and avoid coming back home" a reference  to the former PM's infamous Hawaii trip in 2019.
 
 "(Mr) Morrison is almost as popular as Rolf Harris," Mr Holmes a  Court wrote.
 
 His comparison to the late Australian entertainer, a convicted child sex  offender, attracted immediate ire.
 
 Mr Holmes a Court declined to comment when asked by The Nightly about the  post. Several teal MPs were contacted to comment about the post and the  criticism it attracted, but have so far refused to weigh in.
 
 Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley said the post was "disgusting" and  "juvenile" and Mr Holmes a Court owed the former prime minister an  apology.
 
 "The tweet should have been deleted yesterday, and he should apologise  to Scott Morrison," she told The Nightly.
 
 "Scott Morrison deserves respect for his service to Australia,  regardless of whether you agree with his politics or his record."
 
 "How can any of the teals claim they are about lifting the standard of  politics if they take Simon Holmes a Court's money? This is a test for all  politicians who have taken money from him and everyone that works at Climate  200." Shadow home affairs minister James Paterson called on the teal MPs  to explain whether they endorsed Mr Holmes a Court's "unhinged"  views.
 
 "Australia should be thanking Scott Morrison for keeping up the lines of  communication with the next president of our most important ally, not  vilifying him," he told The Nightly.
 
 "It reflects on the teals that their chief fundraiser thinks this is  comparable to child sexual abuse. But it will harm our national interest if  the teals hold the balance of power after the next election and can influence  the foreign policy of a weak Labor Government."
 
 North Sydney MP Kylea Tink dismissed his influence.
 
 CONTINUED PAGE 6 It reflects on the teals that their chief fundraiser thinks  this is comparable to child sexual abuse.
 
 Sussan Ley
 
 FROM PAGE 5 "Simon Holmes a Court's opinions are his own. He was not,  nor has never been, my chief fundraiser and I have never consulted him on  policy," she told The Australian.
 
 Independent MPs who received Climate 200 backing were contacted for comment.
 
 The electorate office of Curtin MP Kate Chaney was open on Friday but a  spokeswoman said she was on holidays.
 
 It's the second attack on the teals in a month after billionaire Clive Palmer  sought to trademark the terms "teals" and "The Teal  Party".
 
 Independent member for Wentworth Allegra Spender told the National Press Club  in October she was sick of the constant suggestions that Mr Holmes a Court or  some other man was pulling the strings.
 
 "I'm a woman of my middle ages, I've spent 10 or 15 years running  companies, I've got three kids, I've got a life that I'm trying to run here  and I feel this continual . . . insinuation that somebody out there is  pulling the strings I think is insulting to me but I think it's insulting to  women around Australia," she said. "I have a problem with this sort  of idea that women like myself get here and there's someone covertly hiding  behind us pulling all the strings."
 
 Independent community candidates will, again, target Liberal-held seats as  they seek to further capitalise on major party disenchantment and increase  the size of the crossbench in what could push Labor into minority Government.
 
 Political marketing expert Andrew Hughes said this was exactly why the teals  should band together rather than bristle at being seen as a collective.  "If you're the teals, this is where it really matters.
 
 Because now this is the election where you're going to have the most  influence, the most power and the most return on who you are," he said.
 
 "So if I was them, I'd be throwing everything including the kitchen sink  at a decent campaign this time around."
 
 He thought the teals had not managed to land a blow on Liberal leader Peter  Dutton not even on his nuclear power policy, which Dr Hughes thought should  be ripe pickings because they weren't consistent or co-ordinated.
 
 "Had they been a group and been more co-ordinated and had a simple  messaging strategy on that, they would have hit him a little bit  harder," he said.
 
 The Coalition has ramped up its warning that if Labor was forced to rely on  the support of teals or the Greens, that would weaken Australia.
 
 Mr Palmer, the billionaire mining magnate, last month applied to trademark a  raft of terms relating to "teal" and the "teal party", in  an effort to prevent them being used for political or advertising use.
 
 Ms Ley said she felt sorry for the crossbenchers who had "spent the last  four years telling everyone they're not a political party, and don't call us  that, we're a series of independents making independent decisions" but  may now find themselves fighting the trademarking of the term teals.
 
 "We've got one billionaire, Clive Palmer, building the trademarking of  the teal brand, another billionaire Holmes A Court actually trying to create  more teals," she said.

Recent News

All Posts