Media

|

News

Future Fund staff rack up hefty $4.6m travel bill in just one year

September 2, 2025

Tuesday 02 September 2025
Lily McCaffrey
The Australian


 Future Fund staff spent $4.6m on domestic and international travel in just  one year, including burning almost half a million dollars on car transfers  and taxis.
 
 Just weeks after refusing to release the bill under Freedom of Information to  The Australian, the publicly owned investment vehicle belatedly opened up its  travel bills under pressure from the Senate.
 
 Responding to Senate questions on notice, the Future Fund confirmed on Monday  that in the past financial year alone, employees at the $307bn fund excluding  the CEO spent a total of $2,975,888 on international travel, including more  than $1.9m on airfares, $953,595 on accommodation and $76,995 on "car  transfers, taxis and other land travel".
 
 Employees racked up a further $1.4m on domestic travel, comprising $662,073  on flights, $379,613 on accommodation and $375,615 on car transfers and  taxis.
 
 The Future Fund said there were "no breaches of the travel policy",  but 179 reimbursements worth $9422 were made for amounts that fell outside  the agency's travel policy.
 
 Chairman Greg Combet repaid $164, the rest of the board $261, CEO Dr Raphael  Arndt repaid $85 and other employees $8912.
 
 The Future Fund said the reimbursements were for a "number of  reasons" but predominantly related to circumstances where  "employees with both a personal and corporate profile within their Uber  account incorrectly selected their corporate profile", "a portion  of a meal cost was deemed personal by an employee" or "there was an  accidental use of the employee's corporate card".
 
 All amounts had been paid in full as at June 30, 2025, the Future Fund said.
 
 Liberal frontbencher James Paterson, who asked the questions on notice, said:  "It should not be this hard to drag basic information out of a  government agency about their expenditure of taxpayers' money on travel.
 
 "The Future Fund's decision to finally comply with my request through  the Senate makes a mockery of their refusal to provide this same information  in response to a Freedom of Information request from The Australian,"  Senator Paterson said.
 
 "While travel is clearly necessary for the fund to conduct their  activities, they should always be transparent and willing to justify that  expense to the taxpayers they serve."
 
 Independent senator David Pocock, who moved the order for the production of  travel expenditure documents, said: "Spending more than $3m on  international travel and more than $1.5m on domestic travel over a 12-month  period appears significant for a relatively small agency."
 
 "I think it would be useful for the Future Fund to provide a breakdown  of the class of travel, accommodation and range of destinations that went  into these totals," Senator Pocock said.
 
 Between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025, Dr Arndt, spent about $106,410 on  travel, while the board including Mr Combet racked up $106,910. Dr Arndt  spent about $64,929 on flights, $32,705 on accommodation and $8772 on  transfers, while the board spent about $54,386 on flights, $28,789 on  accommodation and $22,733 on transfers.
 
 The Future Fund in its response to the Senate requests said that over the  past decade, travel costs as a percentage of total funds under management had  remained stable at around 0.0015 per cent, excluding the Covid period.
 
 "International and domestic travel has always been a core component of  the agency's operations and risk management efforts, with the performance of  international investment markets being a key driver of the $195.7bn in  investment returns (at March 31, 2025) generated since the fund's  establishment," it said.
 
 In August, the fund released the expenses for the former acting chairman, the  current chairman, six directors and its CEO in response to an FOI request  from The Australian, but refused to release travel costs for its staff  including the other eight members of its executive team, saying to do so  would "divert the resources of the agency from its other  operations".

Recent News

All Posts