Media

|

News

US subs to be 'enduring' in Australia, Pentagon confirms

August 2, 2026

Sunday 02 August 2026
Michael Koziol
The Sydney Morning Herald


 Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy's clarification on the  future of American submarines at HMAS Stirling in Perth has satisfied the  Pentagon, which says their presence in Western Australia will be  ''enduring''.
 
 Conroy caused a political storm during a visit to Washington this week when  he told the ABC's 7.30 program that the rotation of US submarines at HMAS  Stirling was limited to just five years.
 
 That would have ''come as a surprise to American ears'', former Home Affairs  department secretary Michael Pezzullo said, while Coalition defence spokesman  James Paterson accused Conroy of evicting the Americans before they arrived.
 
 Conroy then walked back his remarks in an interview with the Herald, saying  the US was likely to maintain some kind of presence there indefinitely, and  issued a statement to clarify his position.
 
 ''Submarine Rotational Force West is intended to be an enduring element of US  force posture in Australia,'' he said.
 
 The issue at hand is whether American nuclear-powered submarines depart HMAS  Stirling when Australia's Virginia-class boats begin arriving from the US, or  if they maintain some form of presence there, either through rotations or  ongoing visits.
 
 Critics of the AUKUS defence agreement argue that the presence of US  submarines in Perth represents a potential target in the event of a regional  conflict.
 
 Following Conroy's initial remarks, the Pentagon did not respond to inquiries  for 48 hours while it sought clarification on the Australian government's  position.
 
 Yesterday, it provided a statement attributed to a Department of Defence  official: ''Minister Conroy released a statement noting that SRF-West is  intended to be an enduring element of US force posture in Australia.''  Defence strategists in the US government, including Pentagon policy chief  Elbridge Colby, have expressed reservations in the past about losing  US-controlled submarines to Australia at a time when the US defence  industrial base is not producing enough for the US Navy's own demands.
 
 But they also view HMAS Stirling as strategically useful for positioning US  forces to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific. In October, when  Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visited President Donald Trump at the White  House, Trump declared AUKUS was ''full steam ahead''.
 
 Paterson also pointed to remarks by Defence Minister Richard Marles using the  same language as the Pentagon that the US presence in Western Australia would  be enduring.
 
 ''I am relieved Richard Marles finally stepped in on Friday to clean up Pat  Conroy's unedifying and unnecessary mess,'' he said. ''The last thing AUKUS  needs is uncertainty about core elements of the agreement like SRF-West.''  Conroy's trip to the US included high-level meetings with the American Navy  and Army, as well as visits to a shipyard that makes Virginia-class  submarines and a missile factory in Tucson, Arizona.
 
 In an interview in Washington, Conroy said Labor members who believed  Australia was making a mistake with AUKUS were wrong.
 
 ''We've had this debate within the Labor Party for years earlier it was about  the joint facilities, about Pine Gap,'' he said. ''This national conference,  AUKUS wasn't even debated ... There wasn't an amendment that had sufficient  support to make it to the floor.
 
 ''The vast majority of the Labor movement support AUKUS.''

Recent News

All Posts